Was primer firing wierd, not consistent? Federal Gold Medal primers. Ramshot True Blue. 2 Accurate - No.
Just not crazy good like the 124 grain results where 1/2" is great or IMR Target doing ~.2 inches, which is absurd at 10 yards. Vihtavuori 3N37. (Federal Gold Medal). #1 Accurate #2 We think won.
Different loads have very high propensity to hit same tiny area at 10 yards. Name. Notice the strike face area of these are "barely" flattened?
Open up the load data page you wish to download. Those 2 stand out among the group. I don't load much 9mm, but when I do I use Titegroup and watch the charges really close.
115 SW Columbia St | Bend, Oregon, USA 97702 | Toll Free: Nosler Showroom / Open to the Public: Monday - Friday 10:00 am to 5:30 pm PST, Load Data &Technical Information by Cartridge. Ponsness Warren.
Recreational use too. These are soft primers. These are shot off target this time.
Was ogive out of shape? 2 test shots before this group...but not on target. Its better if you have a group where say 80% of them, go through the same hole. So if you have a bunch of bullets through same hole, and then 1 is off, that, we think, is better, because its PREDICTABLE say, 80% of the time, for example. Shooting plates. Maybe this won? Very accurate, solid performance. These in colored box are "fast" powders for 9MM. 22-250 Remington Ackley Improved Load Data, 223 Win Super Short Magnum (WSSM) Load Data, 243 Win Super Short Magnum (WSSM) Load Data, 25 Winchester Super Short Magnum Load Data, 270 Winchester Short Magnum (WSM) Load Data, 7mm Rem Short Action Ultra Magnum Load Data, 7mm Shooting Times Westerner (STW) Load Data, 30-06 Springfield Ackley Improved Load Data, 300 Rem Short Action Ultra Magnum Load Data, 300 Holland & Holland (H&H) Magnum Load Data, 300 Winchester Short Magnum (WSM) Load Data, 325 Winchester Short Magnum (WSM) Load Data, 358 Shooting Times Alaskan (STA) Load Data, 375 Holland & Holland (H&H) Magnum Load Data, 45-70 Gov’t (Strong Actions Only) Load Data, 45 Colt (Single Action Army & Replicas) Load Data, 45 Colt (Ruger & T/C Contender & Encore) Load Data.
Remember this chart is just for quick idea of burn rate, it doesn't mean E3 from Alliant burns slower than HP-38 from Hodgdon, because I think E3 burns faster is our opinion. You can see there from Accurate #2 pic, and D032 pic, those 2 are vastly cleaner cases than anything else. Powder Burn Rates. 147 Grain bullet results. Smokeless Powder; ... trends and tips from the leader in reloading. We added Lovex and the new IMR powders. Load Data &Technical Information by Caliber. If you're unsure, or just want options, check as many boxes as you'd like. In all the tests, Titegroup simply would not group "tite" get it? Click "Get Data" to view results. They are consistent. 28 gauge. We prefer IMR Target, D032, IMR Blue for example. The chart is designed from the fastest burning powder to the slowest burning powder. Select A Caliber or Gauge Below To View Recipes. That is $70 per year based on shooting 10,000 rounds per year.
Of the fast powders... 147 Grain bullet results. We did a comparo of the "fast" burning powders for 9MM.
Red Dot is cleaner than both. Its not that clean though. Powder: Select a Powder Accurate - Nitro 100 NF Accurate - No.
W244 very similar to Sport Pistol or even HP38.
All the rest look similar, HP38, IMR target, N320, Sport Pistol all average dirty/clean depending how you want to look at it. MEC. IMR red is middle of the road dirty for fast powder. Its difficult to describe, but the faster powders feel "snappy", or "jerky", or have harsher recoil that is noticable. Is the group 4 bullets going through same hole and 1 is off? 7 Accurate - Solo 1000 Hodgdon - 700-X Hodgdon - 800-X Hodgdon - AutoComp Hodgdon - CFE Pistol Hodgdon - Clays Hodgdon - HP-38 Hodgdon - HS-6 Hodgdon - Longshot Hodgdon - Titegroup Hodgdon - Universal Ramshot - Competition Ramshot - Silhouette Ramshot - True Blue Ramshot - Zip Winchester - … This chart gives an approximation of where the powders fit within their relative burn rates. We can't confirm this is exact, but we think its ballpark. This is mainly due to the extraordinary "controls" of everything being as close to exact as possible, leading to each round in a lot weighing the near exact same.
Generally, we believe the Precision Delta 147 RN is not as accurate as the 124 Grain HP in this gun, or perhaps, its just the lot we purchased, its hard to pin down things like this. This is a top choice in 9 MM… There's a whopping 0.3 grains between the book's starting and max loads, and a double charge would fit inside a … Different burn rate charts show the same powders in different order, so I think its somewhat confusing to as what powder burns faster than another. 50%, 80%, a high %, you get it. Stay up on the latest. We will pick our favorites, based on how they shot and the groups. 3.3 grains would cost .09 cents per round if 1 lb was $20. Hornady / Spolar. 2 test shots before this group...but not on target.
Vihtavuori N340. So look at this as ballpark. Email * Products. This chart is for informational purposes only and is not designed to take place of data in conventional reloading manuals or this site. Red dot is actually one of the cleaner powders. ShotShell Bushing Chart. Its just about impossible to say why. Right click on the image of the load data and use save as. Precision Delta 124 HP is more accurate bullet than 147 Precision Delta RN? 16 gauge. Its not as easy as saying "Oh, IMR Target was more accurate group, thus its the best". As you can see...124 grain bullets are the left 2/3 of the grid, and 147 grain is on the right 1/3 of the grid, with power factor listed under the FPS. AA#2 proves once again, its the cleanest 9 MM powder we tested. 20 gauge. However, Blue dot a slow powder, takes about 5.6 grains to achieve same velocity. That is $90 using the 3.3 grain powder, and $160 using the 5.6 grain powder. It is too slow. Why did that 1 shot not go through same hole? Excellent all around powder. IMR Blue and Blue dot, we think, felt better to shoot than the faster powders, and we would probably choose one of these for this competition, not a fast powder. However, we can categorize them simply for 9MM caliber. 32 H&R Magnum. We tested over 30 powders that can be used for 9MM. We did a comparo of the "fast" burning powders for 9MM. Whats overall message here perhaps? They are generally more economical.
Then select your bullet weight, powder manufacturer and powder type. Hodgdon CFE Pistol. 9mm Luger (Parabellum) Load Data; 357 Sig Load Data; 38 Special Load Data; 357 Magnum Load Data; 357 Remington Maximum Load Data; 40 S&W Load Data; 10mm Auto Load Data; 41 Remington Magnum Load Data; 44 Special Load Data; 44 Remington Magnum Handgun Load Data; 45 Auto (ACP) Load Data; 45 Colt (Single Action Army & Replicas) Load Data Was it neck tension? Extreme Rifle Powders. 10mm Auto. Its 2nd cleanest here too, we think. Any powder that's going to be really economical is probably also going to be easy to double charge. 147 Grain bullet results. Find what you need in four easy steps. 10 gauge. Fast Powder Roundup: Primer inspection & Preparation method, How does hitting ~130 Power Factor affect one of the softest primers we could find? You can also click on the image and a pdf version will open in a new window. Nosler Inc | Privacy Use Order Processing. N320 is nowhere near as clean as say D032 or AA#2, and noticeably dirtier than Red Dot. Lovex D032 (Shooters World Cleanshot is near Accurate #2 in clean. If both powders cost $20 each. Select your cartridge type from the drop-down list. Titegroup is perhaps the dirtiest 9MM powder we ever tested, and it shows again, across the board, its very dirty.. Bullseye is dirty and its noticable cleaner than TG. 5 Accurate - No. 32 Auto. Excellent all around powder. LEE. All of this is with a match barrel from an XD(M) OSP using Vortex Venom 3 MOA dot at 10 yards.